CPRS Polls - Survey Research Unit
Public Opinion Poll #11
Elections and Palestinian-Jordanian Relations, August, 11-13, 1994
Municipal Appointments and Elections

These poll results confirm what the Palestinians have said in all previous polls, that most believe that elections are the preferred way to select their representatives. In this poll, 78.8% of Palestinians believe that general political elections are the preferred way to choose the interim self-governing authority. This represents an increase over the average of previous months, which is 73%. The increase comes basically from the Gaza Strip, where 83.4% chose elections, only 8.8% of them preferred that the PLO appoint members of the council. This may be due to the political changes in the area that led many to believe that such elections are possible and led others to be concerned about the whole idea of appointments. Many feel that it is necessary to have elected legislative and executive institutions that would be able to face up to the challenge of solving serious problems.

The poll shows a clear correlation between political affiliation and attitudes towards municipal appointments. As can be expected, opposition groups are more critical of appointments than supporting groups. For example, 69.8% of PFLP supporters are against these appointments. (Table 5)

Table 5

Support for Municipal Appointments by Political Affiliation

                 Support %        Support if       Oppose %         No Opinion %     
                                  Temp %                                             
Hamas                 07.5        29.2             52.8             10.4             
Is. Jihad             15.2        26.1             45.7             13.0             
Is. Inds              06.2        43.1             30.8             20.0             
PFLP                  07.3        20.8             69.7             02.1             
DFLP                  12.9        25.8             58.1             03.2             
Fateh                 32.7        53.9             06.1             07.4             
Feda                  40.0        60.0             ---              ---              
H. el-Sha'b           26.9        26.9             42.3             03.8             
Nat'l Inds            13.5        65.9             18.3             02.4             
Other                 21.7        39.1             20.3             18.8             
No One                17.0        39.9             19.3             23.8             

In contrast, only 6.1% of Fateh supporters share this view, compared with 32.7% of them who are supportive of appointments. Among Feda supporters, 40% are supportive of appointments. A number of indicators, as shown in Table 6, illustrate that a high degree of loyalty to the PNA exists among the supporters of Fateh and Feda and their positions on these issues show that they are less liberal than the supporters of those groups which are not part of the PNA, such as Hamas and PFLP.

Table 6

                     Opposed to the Ban   Supportive of        Opposed to           
                                          Freedom of Press     Municipal            
                                          w/o Restriction      Appointments         
Fateh                       59.9          47.5                 6.1                  
Feda                        62.9          37                   ---                  
Hamas                       72.5          66                   52.8                 
PFLP                        81.3          73                   69.8                 

We also find that the most opposition to municipal appointments is in the areas of Bethlehem, Jerusalem, and Hebron. Support for municipal appointments decreases with educational attainment as demonstrated in Table 7.

Table 7

Support for Municipal Appointments by Education

                 I Support %      Support if       I Oppose %       No Opinion %     
                                  Temp %                                             
Up to 9 years         27.3        36.7             19.7             16.3             
Tawjihi               18.7        50.9             21.9             08.5             
2 year college        14.0        51.9             28.5             05.6             
BA/BS                 17.0        46.7             33.2             03.1             
MA/MS/PhD             07.1        50.0             42.9             ---              

The poll results show that opposition to municipal appointments comes from professionals, where 41.2% of them declare that they are against appointments. This may be due to their high level of education and their awareness of the general political situation as they are always following the news. The group least opposed to appointments is merchants, where only 20% of them said that they are against appointments. This may be a result of their dependence on a functioning city council and their belief that appointments create such councils as soon as possible. We also find that opposition to municipal appointments is higher among those who constantly follow the news (27%) than those who never follow the news (21%). In both cases, however, the largest percentage approve of the appointments on the condition that they are temporary and to prepare for elections, which is the official position of the authority.

In regard to participation in general elections to select the members of PISGA, 65.1% of those surveyed expressed their intention to participate. Only 19.6% said that they will not participate and another 15.3% said that they were not sure. Here we find that more Gazans (69.3%) want to participate in elections than West Bankers (62.9%).

The poll shows a clear correlation between following the news and the intention to participate in elections where we find that 69.3% of those who constantly follow the news express their intention to participate while 47.4% of those who do not follow the news express the same intention. This is an expected correlation since following the news may be a demonstration of interest in political events and subsequent involvement in political life.

Palestinian Leadership

Two months after the establishment of the Palestinian authority in the Gaza Strip and Jericho, the poll shows that 25.2% of Palestinians declare that their support for Palestinian leadership has increased. Another 17.2% said that their support has decreased. At the same time 27.9% said that their evaluation was initially positive and has not changed, while 19.2% said that their evaluation was initially negative and has not changed. This means that 53.1% view Palestinian leadership positively and 36.4% view it negatively. Another 10.5% said that they had no opinion on this issue.

The results indicate that the positive view of Palestinian leadership is higher in Gaza than in the West Bank. A total of 57.2% in Gaza said that they viewed Palestinian leadership positively, compared with 51% in the West Bank. It was also noticeable that the most decrease in support for the Palestinian leadership is in Jericho, with 35.1% of residents surveyed said that their support has decreased two months after the establishment of Palestinian authority there. In Gaza, the decrease in support was not as sharp, at 16.6%. There are more people who view the Palestinian leadership negatively than positively in the following areas: Bethlehem, Hebron, and Jerusalem. In Nablus, however, the positive evaluation of the leadership reached 58.1%, compared with 36.4% negative.

Table 8

Evaluation of Leadership by Area of Residence

              Increase %    Decrease %    No change,    No Change,    No Opinion %  
                                          Positive %    Negative %                  
Nablus            26.6      20.7          31.5          14.7          06.5          
Tulkarm           24.1      12.0          37.6          15.0          11.3          
Jenin             36.9      12.6          32.0          09.7          08.8          
Jericho           21.6      35.1          27.0          05.4          10.9          
Ramallah          19.0      12.1          27.6          18.1          23.2          
Hebron            23.4      12.6          17.3          31.8          14.9          
Bethlehem         30.1      23.9          14.2          27.4          04.4          
Jerusalem         17.5      25.4          24.6          23.7          08.8          

In addition, we find an inverse correlation between education and evaluation of Palestinian leadership. A total of 47.4% of bachelor's degree holders surveyed evaluated the leadership negatively and 41.2% of them evaluated the leadership positively. A related correlation is found among professionals whose positive evaluation of the leadership is at 32.4% while their negative evaluation is at 52.9%.

Political Affiliation

The results of the poll show a slight decrease in the popularity of Fateh. A total of 39% declared their support for Fateh this month, compared with 41.7% last month. The decrease in support is more obvious in the Gaza Strip, where Fateh was at 45.2% last month and is now at 40.4%. Although support for Fateh exists among the members of all social categories, we find that it is higher among those with less education. For example, 44% of those with 12 years of education or less support Fateh and only 28.5% of those with a bachelor's degree support it.

The results of the poll show that support for Hamas is constant at 13.7%. In the Gaza Strip, however, we notice a slight increase (1.1%) in its popularity from last month. A total of 31.8% of Palestinians surveyed said that they are independent, undecided, or will not elect any of the groups listed in the questionnaire. In the Gaza Strip, 17.7% said that they will not vote for any of the groups listed. This could be an indication of rational decision reflecting their inability to decide for whom they will vote or an indication of their desire to see Palestinian groups form coalitions or that they are tired of factionalism or that they are afraid to express their real political affiliation. Probably all of these reasons contribute to a higher percentage of those who are undecided.

Looking at students, which is the largest group in Palestinian society to have recent experience with elections, we find that a coalition among opposition groups (Hamas, Islamic Jihad, PFLP, DFLP) will gain 37.7% of the vote compared with 43.5% for a coalition among supporting groups (Fateh, Feda, Hizb el-Sha'b). Independents would gain 5.0% of the vote, with the remaining 13.7% going to "others" or "no one."

Furthermore, we notice that support for Fateh is higher in the north of the West Bank than the middle or south. Also, support for Hamas is higher in the area of Hebron.

Table 9

Political Affiliation by Place of Residence

          Hamas %   H.el-   DFLP %   Feda %  Isl.    Fateh %  PFLP %   Isl      Nat    O'er   No one   
                    Shab %                   Jihad                     Inds %.  Ind %  %      %        
                                             %                                                         
Nablus      10.9    0.5     2.2      1.6     1.1     51.6     8.7      2.2      4.9    5.4    10.9     
T'lkrm      12.2    2.3     0.8      5.3     3.8     44.3     0.8      6.1      10.8   2.3    11.3     
Jenin       9.8     ---     2.0      2.0     1.0     50.0     1.0      2.9      5.9    7.8    17.6     
Jericho     13.5    ---     ---      ---     8.1     32.4     5.4      ---      10.8   10.8   19.0     
Ram.'h      11.4    2.6     2.6      ---     1.8     28.9     2.6      4.4      6.1    10.5   29.1     
Hebron      22.0    2.8     1.9      3.3     7.0     30.4     5.6      6.1      9.8    3.3    7.8      
B'hem       13.3    7.1     7.1      7.1     1.8     28.3     12.4     5.3      12.4   ---    5.2      
J'salem     4.6     1.8     3.7      2.8     0.9     34.9     4.6      11.0     22.0   0.9    12.8     
Gaza A      14.1    1.3     ---      ---     3.8     35.9     11.5     2.6      5.1    7.7    18.0     
Gaza B      14.3    ---     ---      ---     2.2     38.5     6.6      2.2      6.6    2.2    27.4     
Gaza C      14.1    ---     1.0      ---     4.0     29.3     7.1      6.1      7.1    13.1   18.2     
Gaza D      25.3    1.3     2.5      1.3     2.5     49.4     5.1      ---      3.8    ---    8.8      
Gaza E      13.3    1.0     2.0      3.1     3.1     53.1     7.1      1.0      3.1    2.0    11.2     
Gaza F      13.3    ---     ---      1.3     1.3     36.0     12.0     4.0      6.7    1.3    24.1     

Appendix A

1. Last month, a municipal council was appointed in Gaza and a municipal 
committee in Nablus. With regard to municipal appointments, I...
                                              Total West Bank Gaza
a. Support them                                21.1%  22.8%  17.9%
b. Support them if they are                    44.6%  42.7%  48.0%
temporary and in preparation
for elections.
c. Oppose them                                 23.9%  25.5%  20.9%
d. Have no Opinion                             10.4%  09.0%  13.2%
2. Recently, al-Nahar and Akhbar al-Balad were banned from some Palestinian 
territories
a. I support the ban                           15.7%  18.5%  10.5%
b. I oppose the ban                            65.9%  63.7%  69.9%
c. No opinion                                  18.4%  17.8%  19.6%
3. With regard to freedom of the press, I
a. Support freedom for Palestinian             12.7%  13.9%  10.5%
press that supports the official
national line only (the line of
the Palestinian National Authority).
b. Support freedom for Palestinian             25.4%  24.1%  27.9%
press that supports the official
national line and that of the
opposition.
c. Support freedom for Palestinian             55.2%  54.2%  57.1%
(whether supportive or opposing)
and non-Palestinian press without
conditions.
d. Have no opinion                             06.7%  07.8%  04.5%
4. Two months after the establishment of the Palestinian National Authority 
in Gaza and Jericho, I...
a. Have increased my support for the           25.2%  25.0%  25.8%
Palestinian leadership.
b. Have decreased my support for the           17.2%  17.5%  16.6%
Palestinian leadership.
c. Have not changed my support for             27.9%  26.0%  31.4%
the leadership, which was
positive.
d. Have not changed my support for             19.2%  20.3%  17.0%
the leadership, which was
negative.
e. Have no opinion                             10.5%  11.2%  09.2%
5. In my opinion, religious sovereignty in Jerusalem (including supervision 
of the Awqaf and Islamic religious places in the city) should be
a. Palestinian                                 67.5%  65.3%  71.6%
b. Jordanian                                   00.8%  00.9%  00.6%
c. joint Palestinian-Jordanian                 07.6%  10.1%  02.8%
d. joint Arab-Islamic                          21.8%  20.7%  23.7%
e. Other (Specify)                             02.3%  03.0%  01.3%
6. With regard to the Jordanian-Israeli agreement that was signed in 
Washington last month by King Hussein and Yitzhak Rabin, I believe that it..
a. Will not influence Palestinian-             25.4%  24.7%  26.9%
Jordanian relations.
b. Will influence Palestinian-                 18.6%  18.8%  18.3%
Jordanian relations positively.
c. Will influence Palestinian-                 40.6%  40.6%  40.5%
Jordanian relations negatively.
d. No opinion                                  15.4%  15.9%  14.3%
7. Included in the aforementioned Jordanian-Israeli agreement is the 
following part with regard to Jerusalem: (Israel respects the present 
special role of the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan in Muslim holy shrines 
in Jerusalem. When negotiations on the permanent status will take place, 
Israel will give high priority to the Jordanian historic role in these 
shrines.)
That part concerning the Jordanian role in Jerusalem:
a. will facilitate the return to               15.9%  15.3%  16.9%
Palestinian sovereignty over
Jerusalem in the final negotiations.
b. will hinder the return to                   52.4%  49.1%  58.8%
Palestinian sovereignty over
Jerusalem in the final negotiations.
c. will have no impact on the                  18.2%  21.3%  12.5%
chances of the return to
Palestinian control over Jerusalem
in the final negotiations.
d. No opinion                                  13.5%  14.3%  11.8%
8. In your opinion, what is the best way to choose the members of the 
"Palestinian Council" of the Palestinian Interim Self-Governing Authority?
a. Appointment by PLO leadership               11.2%  12.5%  08.8%
b. Appointment by political groups             07.0%  07.2%  06.5% 
on a quota basis.
c. Political Elections                         78.8%  76.4%  83.4%
d. Other                                       03.0%  03.9%  01.3%
9. Will you participate in the election for the "Palestinian Council" of 
the Palestinian Interim Self-Governing Authority?
a. Yes                                         65.1%  62.9%  69.3%
b. No                                          19.6%  21.8%  15.5%
c. Not sure                                    15.3%  15.3%  15.2% 
10. If elections were to be held today, and you decided to participate, 
you would vote for candidates affiliated with:
a. Hamas                                       13.9%  13.0%  15.6% 
b. Hizb al-Sha'b                               01.7%  02.3%  00.6%
c. DFLP                                        02.0%  02.6%  01.0%
d. Feda                                        02.3%  03.0%  01.0%
e. Islamic Jihad                               03.0%  03.1%  02.9%
f. Fateh                                       39.0%  38.2%  40.4%
g. PFLP                                        06.3%  05.4%  08.1%
h. Islamic independents                        04.3%  05.1%  02.7%
i. Nationalist independents                    08.3%  09.9%  05.4%
j. Other (specify)                             04.5%  04.5%  04.6%
k. None of the above                           14.7%  12.9%  17.7% 

Appendix B

Polling Districts
The West Bank
The West Bank was divided into 8 areas and 18 polling districts as follows:
  District     Population   Sample size   District     Population    Sample      
               size **                                 size          size        
Nablus city     85,375       63            Tulkarm     105,699       69          
                                           (North)                               
Nablus East     81,995       60            Tulkarm      96,738       68          
                                           (South)                               
Nablus West     63,638       61            Tulkarm     202,432       137         
                                           (Total)                               
Nablus Total   230,998      184                                                 
  District     Population   Sample size    District    Population    Sample      
               size                                    size          size        
Jenin (East)    96,721       72            Jericho      25,957        38          
Jenin          100,490       32                                                  
(West)                                                                            
Jenin  Total   197,211      104                                                 
  District     Population   Sample size    District    Population    Sample      
               size                                    size          size        
Ramallah        76,983       30            Hebron       82,947        73          
(North)                                    (North)                               
Ramallah        77,533       53            Hebron       80,073        70          
(South)                                    (South)                               
Ramallah        75,178       36            Hebron       96,545        71          
(City)                                     (city)                                
Ramallah       229,694      119            Hebron      259,565       214         
Total                                      Total                                 

  District     Population   Sample         District    Population    Sample    
               size         size                       size          size      
Bethlehem       68,646       57            Jerusalem     83,580        57        
(City)                                                 (Vicinity)                          
Bethlehem       70,273       56            Jerusalem     81,370        57        
(Vicinity)                                       (City)                            
Bethlehem      138,919      113            Jerusalem    165,310       114       
Total                                                   Total                               

* (a complete list of villages and camps included in each district may be obtained from CPRS.)

The Gaza Strip
The Gaza Strip was divided into 6 polling districts as shown below:
  District       Population     Sample      Sample Distribution                 
                 size           size**                                          
Gaza A           141,915         85         Jabalyia Camp, Jabalyia Village,    
                                            al-Nazla                            
Gaza B           150,000        100         Rimal                               
Gaza C           151,000         99         Zaytoun, Sabra                      
Gaza D           116,600         80         Deir al-Balah Camp, Deir al-Balah   
                                            City, Bureij Camp                   
Gaza E           140,524        100         Khan Younis City, Abbasan           
                                            al-Kabira                           
Gaza F           102,346         90         Rafah Camp                          

* CPRS estimates are based on the figures provided by Palestinian Population Handbook (Jerusalem: Planning and Research Center, 1993).

** In addition, interested individuals may obtain the results of the voting patterns in each district each one of these areas according to place of residence (city, village, and refugee camp) by contacting CPRS.

[ PSR Home ] [ Index of Polls ] [ This Poll's Previous Section ] [ This Poll's Next Section ]